Tort Law at University Of Huddersfield | Flashcards & Summaries

Select your language

Suggested languages for you:
English (US)

Americas

English (US)

Europe

Deutsch (DE) English (UK)
Log In Start studying!

Lernmaterialien für Tort Law an der University of Huddersfield

Greife auf kostenlose Karteikarten, Zusammenfassungen, Übungsaufgaben und Altklausuren für deinen Tort Law Kurs an der University of Huddersfield zu.

TESTE DEIN WISSEN
Case law for foreseeability ( type of harm)? 
Lösung anzeigen
TESTE DEIN WISSEN
 

Page v smith 1966 

Foreseeabile that c would suffer injury as a result of Ds Negligence. 
Lösung ausblenden
TESTE DEIN WISSEN
What is proximity? 

Lösung anzeigen
TESTE DEIN WISSEN
persons that are closely and directly effected. 
Lösung ausblenden
TESTE DEIN WISSEN
Case law for proximity in establishing a duty of care?
Lösung anzeigen
TESTE DEIN WISSEN
Bourhill v Young [1943]
: no duty of care owed by D 
= no sufficient proximity. 

Lösung ausblenden
TESTE DEIN WISSEN
Case law for proximity in negligent information? 
Lösung anzeigen
TESTE DEIN WISSEN
Hadley Byrne and heller [1964]
: bank carelessly supplied evidence of creditworthiness. C loses money= insolvent. 

Valid proximity and duty of care but there was a clause of taking no responsibility.  
Lösung ausblenden
TESTE DEIN WISSEN
Merphy v Brentwood [1991]: 
Lösung anzeigen
TESTE DEIN WISSEN
Proximity is based on foreseeability. 
Lösung ausblenden
TESTE DEIN WISSEN
Proximity for skilled claimants? 
Lösung anzeigen
TESTE DEIN WISSEN
Roles v Nathen 

Clamiments killed by carbon monoxide 
Lösung ausblenden
TESTE DEIN WISSEN
proximity in children? ( Case law)
Lösung anzeigen
TESTE DEIN WISSEN
Taylor v Glasgow cc 1992 

Foreseeable that children would eat the berries. And there was no adequate warning or prevention measures. 
Lösung ausblenden
TESTE DEIN WISSEN
relationships between foreseeability and proximity? 
Lösung anzeigen
TESTE DEIN WISSEN
foreseeability may exist

that does not mean that proximity may also be present

“”Visa Versa””
Lösung ausblenden
TESTE DEIN WISSEN
caparo v dickman [1990] 

Lösung anzeigen
TESTE DEIN WISSEN
  • proximity….
  • No duty of care owed 
  • Not sufficient proximity 
  • The auditors report only meant for shareholders 
Lösung ausblenden
TESTE DEIN WISSEN
define omissions, when it imposes and case law? 
Lösung anzeigen
TESTE DEIN WISSEN
Failure to help someone who is facing danger. 
No liability if……

  • Special relationship 
  • A close zone of danger 
Home office v Dorset Yact club. 
  • Assumption of responsibility 
Barret v MOD 1995. 
  • Reliance
Lösung ausblenden
TESTE DEIN WISSEN
Case law for public authorities? 
Lösung anzeigen
TESTE DEIN WISSEN
Robinson v chief constable West Yorkshire 

Elderly woman injured 
Held: duty of care was not owed. 

link with caparo test 
Lösung ausblenden
TESTE DEIN WISSEN
1st element of duty of care? 
Lösung anzeigen
TESTE DEIN WISSEN
Foreseeability.

Vacwell engineering v BDH chemicals (1971).

☠️Neg in giving sufficient warnings about chemicals.  
Lösung ausblenden
  • 5974 Karteikarten
  • 191 Studierende
  • 0 Lernmaterialien
Jetzt loslegen

Beispielhafte Karteikarten für deinen Tort Law Kurs an der University of Huddersfield - von Kommilitonen auf StudySmarter erstellt!

Q:
Case law for foreseeability ( type of harm)? 
A:
 

Page v smith 1966 

Foreseeabile that c would suffer injury as a result of Ds Negligence. 
Q:
What is proximity? 

A:
persons that are closely and directly effected. 
Q:
Case law for proximity in establishing a duty of care?
A:
Bourhill v Young [1943]
: no duty of care owed by D 
= no sufficient proximity. 

Q:
Case law for proximity in negligent information? 
A:
Hadley Byrne and heller [1964]
: bank carelessly supplied evidence of creditworthiness. C loses money= insolvent. 

Valid proximity and duty of care but there was a clause of taking no responsibility.  
Q:
Merphy v Brentwood [1991]: 
A:
Proximity is based on foreseeability. 
Mehr Karteikarten anzeigen
Q:
Proximity for skilled claimants? 
A:
Roles v Nathen 

Clamiments killed by carbon monoxide 
Q:
proximity in children? ( Case law)
A:
Taylor v Glasgow cc 1992 

Foreseeable that children would eat the berries. And there was no adequate warning or prevention measures. 
Q:
relationships between foreseeability and proximity? 
A:
foreseeability may exist

that does not mean that proximity may also be present

“”Visa Versa””
Q:
caparo v dickman [1990] 

A:
  • proximity….
  • No duty of care owed 
  • Not sufficient proximity 
  • The auditors report only meant for shareholders 
Q:
define omissions, when it imposes and case law? 
A:
Failure to help someone who is facing danger. 
No liability if……

  • Special relationship 
  • A close zone of danger 
Home office v Dorset Yact club. 
  • Assumption of responsibility 
Barret v MOD 1995. 
  • Reliance
Q:
Case law for public authorities? 
A:
Robinson v chief constable West Yorkshire 

Elderly woman injured 
Held: duty of care was not owed. 

link with caparo test 
Q:
1st element of duty of care? 
A:
Foreseeability.

Vacwell engineering v BDH chemicals (1971).

☠️Neg in giving sufficient warnings about chemicals.  
Tort Law

Erstelle und finde Lernmaterialien auf StudySmarter.

Greife kostenlos auf tausende geteilte Karteikarten, Zusammenfassungen, Altklausuren und mehr zu.

Jetzt loslegen

Das sind die beliebtesten Tort Law Kurse im gesamten StudySmarter Universum

Tort Law: Breach of Dury

University of Warwick

Zum Kurs
Law of Contract and Tort

University of the West Indies, Mona

Zum Kurs
law 2

Erasmus University Rotterdam

Zum Kurs
law

Lambton College

Zum Kurs
law

De Montfort University Leicester

Zum Kurs

Die all-in-one Lernapp für Studierende

Greife auf Millionen geteilter Lernmaterialien der StudySmarter Community zu
Kostenlos anmelden Tort Law
Erstelle Karteikarten und Zusammenfassungen mit den StudySmarter Tools
Kostenlos loslegen Tort Law